[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Inevitable death, was Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix
- Subject: Inevitable death, was Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix
- From: george.herbert at gmail.com (George Herbert)
- Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 13:42:28 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CAEmG1=prUtD+6GTSQNNaRDs9T2JuCWYvaOp4o0UrE_VYAGr-jw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAP4=VciHrbGRiNHAyyZPSTVNpabDOJuRLAmBUjK+hbnMgMBP1Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAMrdfRz_9ccn+wGay3_zUaP=xa=4RpjQ1Hp06M8xwF-kedSB-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAEmG1=prUtD+6GTSQNNaRDs9T2JuCWYvaOp4o0UrE_VYAGr-jw@mail.gmail.com>
> On Jul 14, 2014, at 10:41 AM, Matthew Petach <mpetach at netflight.com> wrote:
>
> Brett's concerns seem to center around his
> ability to be cost-competitive with the big
> guys in his area...which implies there *are*
> big guys in his area to have to compete with.
He 's running wireless links, from web and prior info as I recall. His key business seems to be outside the cable tv / DSL wire loop ranges from wire centers. The bigger services seem to have fiber into Laramie, and Brett seems to have fiber to that Denver exchange pointlet .
Why he's not getting fiber to a bigger exchange point or better transit is unclear.
There are bandwidth reseller / BGP / interconnect specialist ISPs out there who live to fix these things, if there's anything like a viable customer base...
George William Herbert
Sent from my iPhone