[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Carrier Grade NAT
- Subject: Carrier Grade NAT
- From: shawnl at up.net (Shawn L)
- Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 16:18:18 -0400
- In-reply-to: <D00131EE.6840A%[email protected]>
- References: <CAMDdSzNABh=OtkQn52xJLaY=h26Ho3Bkk54aVSJTXeDXsO30MQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGvVXhRzfXdS3Gc8s-8N4fg49mLPPz7xucCP0zb-6_7sDdLLQg@mail.gmail.com> <D00131EE.6840A%[email protected]>
Slightly off-topic but what are people using as a cpe device in a
dual-stack scenario like this?
On Friday, August 1, 2014, Lee Howard <Lee at asgard.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/30/14 3:45 PM, "joshua rayburn" <jbrayburn at gmail.com <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >Starting in 3.10 code you can utilize Bulk Port Allocation to carve out
> >small consecutive port bundles for end users as to not mess up SIP
> >functionsand High Speed Logging to log individual customers ports for law
> >enforcement needs without overrunning your logging server.
>
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6056 documents a security concern with bulk
> port assignments.
>
> Lee
>
>
>