[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Carrier Grade NAT
- Subject: Carrier Grade NAT
- From: Lee at asgard.org (Lee Howard)
- Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 12:01:48 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAGvVXhRzfXdS3Gc8s-8N4fg49mLPPz7xucCP0zb-6_7sDdLLQg@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAMDdSzNABh=OtkQn52xJLaY=h26Ho3Bkk54aVSJTXeDXsO30MQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGvVXhRzfXdS3Gc8s-8N4fg49mLPPz7xucCP0zb-6_7sDdLLQg@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/30/14 3:45 PM, "joshua rayburn" <jbrayburn at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Starting in 3.10 code you can utilize Bulk Port Allocation to carve out
>small consecutive port bundles for end users as to not mess up SIP
>functionsand High Speed Logging to log individual customers ports for law
>enforcement needs without overrunning your logging server.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6056 documents a security concern with bulk
port assignments.
Lee