[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?

Subject: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:15:47 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Randy Carpenter <rcarpen at network1.net> wrote:
> How many sites do you have? If less than 192, /44 is
> perfect, unless some of those sites require more than
> a /48. Then, it gets more complicated :-)

We're having a general math breakdown today. First Jeroen wants to fit
5 /48's in a /47 and now you want to fit 192 /48's in a /44.

48-44=4. 2^4=16.

-Bill




-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com  bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004

Follow-Ups:
- Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
  - From: rcarpen at network1.net (Randy Carpenter)
- Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
  - From: mysidia at gmail.com (Jimmy Hess)

References:
- Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
  - From: jrhett at netconsonance.com (Jo Rhett)
- Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
  - From: rcarpen at network1.net (Randy Carpenter)

Prev by Date: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
Next by Date: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
Previous by thread: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
Next by thread: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread