[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?

Subject: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
From: jrhett at netconsonance.com (Jo Rhett)
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 14:33:40 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>

On Oct 11, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
> so there really is no drawback from getting the /44, and having enough space to not have to worry about it in the future.


It's only a worry if you can only route /48s, which was my question. And seriously, we're going to be banging around in the emptiness as compared to our IPv4 allocations. :)

-- 
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet projects.

Follow-Ups:
- Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
  - From: rcarpen at network1.net (Randy Carpenter)

References:
- Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
  - From: rcarpen at network1.net (Randy Carpenter)

Prev by Date: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
Next by Date: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
Previous by thread: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
Next by thread: Is a /48 still the smallest thing you can route independently?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread