[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
2012/3/15 Masataka Ohta <mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>:
> Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
>> You're asking a "what if" for a usage case that nobody sane has suggested.
>
> If you are saying it's insane to use DNS to manage frequently
> changing locations of mobile hosts instead of relying on
> immobile home agents, I fully agree with you.
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Masataka Ohta
Non sequitur.
Mobile root DNS servers are what is insane, because the queries must
terminate somewhere, and ultimately there must be something that
doesn't have a circular dependency -- requiring working DNS to get
DNS.
As for using DNS to manage frequently changing locations of mobile hosts,
DNS is almost perfect for that -- it's just the sort of thing DNS is
designed for,
depending on how frequent you mean by "frequently changing".
--
-JH
- References:
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: jsw at inconcepts.biz (Jeff Wheeler)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: joelja at bogus.com (Joel jaeggli)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: dougb at dougbarton.us (Doug Barton)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: rs at seastrom.com (Robert E. Seastrom)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: bicknell at ufp.org (Leo Bicknell)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)