[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary

Subject: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 09:29:44 +0900
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAPWAtbJx56qyroisNYmB=0q8dDYMixfZBfQwDTVxmW=Y6mhP6w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAP-guGWZkk+6jdAU5YcpWQMHXotXVBy726VO5d-OPFZ6nDR4Vw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAP-guGXAiRwug+KjNtFdfJcYt33G-m=DL6qFAvjU0Qo90y98+Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAP-guGXev-s1PaavQ8gka+UUqbfHYnd5isnSn=vCMVBu=jJKTA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAP-guGW_L+FOJB=+BFZKA6Q8SOqpAqftF-Ep58oqfG2Y-DkVHQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAP-guGVEOprmg-EdvU5Xzmz0RhY7-On+04LKAg=878C5=iO55g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:

> You're asking a "what if" for a usage case that nobody sane has suggested.

If you are saying it's insane to use DNS to manage frequently
changing locations of mobile hosts instead of relying on
immobile home agents, I fully agree with you.

						Masataka Ohta

Follow-Ups:
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: mysidia at gmail.com (Jimmy Hess)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)

References:
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: jsw at inconcepts.biz (Jeff Wheeler)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: joelja at bogus.com (Joel jaeggli)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: dougb at dougbarton.us (Doug Barton)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: rs at seastrom.com (Robert E. Seastrom)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: bicknell at ufp.org (Leo Bicknell)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)

Prev by Date: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Next by Date: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Previous by thread: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Next by thread: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread