[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary

Subject: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: josh.hoppes at gmail.com (Josh Hoppes)
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 20:37:16 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAPWAtbJx56qyroisNYmB=0q8dDYMixfZBfQwDTVxmW=Y6mhP6w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAP-guGWZkk+6jdAU5YcpWQMHXotXVBy726VO5d-OPFZ6nDR4Vw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAP-guGXAiRwug+KjNtFdfJcYt33G-m=DL6qFAvjU0Qo90y98+Q@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> I fully expect them to develop an HDCP-or-equivalent enabled protocol to run over IP Multicast.
>
> Do you have any reason you believe that won't happen?
>
> Owen

I'm pretty sure it's already in place for IPTV solutions.

References:
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: jsw at inconcepts.biz (Jeff Wheeler)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: joelja at bogus.com (Joel jaeggli)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: dougb at dougbarton.us (Doug Barton)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: rs at seastrom.com (Robert E. Seastrom)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: bicknell at ufp.org (Leo Bicknell)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: malayter at gmail.com (Ryan Malayter)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: malayter at gmail.com (Ryan Malayter)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)

Prev by Date: Verizon FiOS - is BGP an option?
Next by Date: Verizon FiOS - is BGP an option?
Previous by thread: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Next by thread: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread