[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
On Mar 14, 2012, at 9:18 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu> <Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:13:41 PDT, Owen DeLong said:
>> I expect within my lifetime that multi-gigabit ethernet will become
>> commonplace in the household LAN environment and that when that
>> becomes reality, localized IP Multicast over multi-gigabit ethernet
>> will eventually supplant HDMI as the primary transport for audio/video
>> streams between devices (sources such as BD players, DVRs,
>> computers, etc. and destinations such as receivers/amps, monitors,
>> speaker drivers, etc.).
>
> The only reason you got HDMI at all was because the content owners managed
> to get HDCP included. You won't get a replacement that doesn't do HDCP until
> we fix the sorry state of copyright in the US.
>
> So it's equivalent to asking if we're going to fix copyright within your lifetime... :)
I fully expect them to develop an HDCP-or-equivalent enabled protocol to run over IP Multicast.
Do you have any reason you believe that won't happen?
Owen
- References:
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: jsw at inconcepts.biz (Jeff Wheeler)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: joelja at bogus.com (Joel jaeggli)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: dougb at dougbarton.us (Doug Barton)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: rs at seastrom.com (Robert E. Seastrom)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: bicknell at ufp.org (Leo Bicknell)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: malayter at gmail.com (Ryan Malayter)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: malayter at gmail.com (Ryan Malayter)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)