[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary

Subject: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 22:14:00 +0100
In-reply-to: <CAP-guGVBm51DbDvZGxBXDwgpBbrGdOqp2N3JNcTejO3H7b3Bzg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPWAtbJx56qyroisNYmB=0q8dDYMixfZBfQwDTVxmW=Y6mhP6w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <EMEW3|981e8b77000778b4cc8d6b77c6365d69o2BJpA03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|[email protected]> <CAP-guGVBm51DbDvZGxBXDwgpBbrGdOqp2N3JNcTejO3H7b3Bzg@mail.gmail.com>

On 12 Mar 2012, at 21:15 , William Herrin wrote:

> Not at all. You just build a second tier to the routing system.

It's so strange how people think a locator/identifier split will solve the scalability problem. We already have two tiers: DNS names and IP addresses. So that didn't solve anything. I don't see any reason a second second tier would.

Follow-Ups:
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: lukasz at bromirski.net (Łukasz Bromirski)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: gih at apnic.net (Geoff Huston)

References:
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: jsw at inconcepts.biz (Jeff Wheeler)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: joelja at bogus.com (Joel jaeggli)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: dougb at dougbarton.us (Doug Barton)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: rs at seastrom.com (Robert E. Seastrom)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: seth.mos at dds.nl (Seth Mos)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: seth.mos at dds.nl (Seth Mos)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk (Tim Chown)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)

Prev by Date: Programmers with network engineering skills
Next by Date: Re: US withdraws IANA RFP, ‘no suitable responses’
Previous by thread: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Next by thread: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread