[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary

Subject: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:09:20 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAPWAtbJx56qyroisNYmB=0q8dDYMixfZBfQwDTVxmW=Y6mhP6w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Mar 12, 2012, at 8:23 AM, Seth Mos wrote:

> On 12-3-2012 16:07, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
>> 
>> Doug Barton <dougb at dougbarton.us> writes:
>> 
> 
>> Grass-roots, bottom-up policy process
>> +
>> Need for multihoming
>> +
>> Got tired of waiting
>> =
>> IPv6 PI
> 
> +
> Cheap End Users
> =
> IPv6 NPt (IPv6 Prefix Translation)
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Seth

I don't get the association between cheap end users and NPT. Can you explain how one relates to the other, given the added costs of unnecessarily translating prefixes?

Owen

Follow-Ups:
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: seth.mos at dds.nl (Seth Mos)

References:
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: jsw at inconcepts.biz (Jeff Wheeler)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: joelja at bogus.com (Joel jaeggli)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: iljitsch at muada.com (Iljitsch van Beijnum)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: dougb at dougbarton.us (Doug Barton)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: rs at seastrom.com (Robert E. Seastrom)
- Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: seth.mos at dds.nl (Seth Mos)

Prev by Date: Programmers with network engineering skills
Next by Date: Ciena CN4200 documentation
Previous by thread: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Next by thread: Shim6, was: Re: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread