[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filtering /48 is going to be necessary

Subject: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:52:50 +0900
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAPWAtbJx56qyroisNYmB=0q8dDYMixfZBfQwDTVxmW=Y6mhP6w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAAAwwbW9vxxB1rgn6YthkvJ_rL3kF_y4frEdbOzbbrp-L+oi7g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <41F6C547EA49EC46B4EE1EB2BC2F34184ABD176F30@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

> Imposing arbitary political considerations on organizations that are
> simply trying to operate networks in order preserve maximal
> aggregation at a given level seems absurd on the face of it.

arin policy weenies live for this!

randy

References:
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: jsw at inconcepts.biz (Jeff Wheeler)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: berni at birkenwald.de (Bernhard Schmidt)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: mysidia at gmail.com (Jimmy Hess)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: sander at steffann.nl (Sander Steffann)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: leo.vegoda at icann.org (Leo Vegoda)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: joelja at bogus.com (Joel jaeggli)

Prev by Date: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Next by Date: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Previous by thread: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Next by thread: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread