[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filtering /48 is going to be necessary

Subject: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
From: leo.vegoda at icann.org (Leo Vegoda)
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 15:45:41 -0800
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAPWAtbJx56qyroisNYmB=0q8dDYMixfZBfQwDTVxmW=Y6mhP6w@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAAAwwbW9vxxB1rgn6YthkvJ_rL3kF_y4frEdbOzbbrp-L+oi7g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

Hi,

Sander wrote:

> Splitting the allocation can be done for many reasons. There are known cases where one LIR operates multiple separate networks, each with a separate routing policy. They cannot get multiple allocations from the RIR and they cannot announce the whole allocation as a whole because of the separate routing policies (who are sometimes required legally, for example when an NREN has both a commercial and an educational network).

If they have two different routing policies and need two different allocations, why not just have two different LIRs? It makes things a lot easier than spending untold weeks or time trying to work out which corner cases should be supported by policy and which should not. No?

Leo

Follow-Ups:
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)

References:
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: jsw at inconcepts.biz (Jeff Wheeler)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: berni at birkenwald.de (Bernhard Schmidt)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: mysidia at gmail.com (Jimmy Hess)
- filtering /48 is going to be necessary
  - From: sander at steffann.nl (Sander Steffann)

Prev by Date: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Next by Date: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Previous by thread: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Next by thread: filtering /48 is going to be necessary
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread