[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?

Subject: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:55:02 -0500
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:47:15 PST." <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <CALFTrnPDH6BOgNqGyGGMmWjO1tw3gCDtwSgS_8ewMcXZBbcXvA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CALFTrnPV69sF2dRKxSObrnU4rJ2OXyWdk8e0Ns8f=k1rB4S4rg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <EMEW3|b72a697efe1157735ee304b250d989f0o0PAfI03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <EMEW3|2a2c119f25d47ec1dfcdc216e4ec9ca4o0PBG303tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CALFTrnN2Taaoz5xvoi6_w7MPHmBOkhWgudeifT1VoB1FcnVm4A@mail.gmail.com> <EMEW3|929220d72fa66af39a27d057a2c579d2o0PE5803tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|[email protected]> <[email protected]> <5CCCFAC0! [email protected]> <EMEW3|5db507545b9f74702a62969694d5e2b0o0PNVk03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:47:15 PST, Owen DeLong said:
> Where the definition of (efficient) is highly flexible and almost
> certainly does not refer to bit conservation.

There's a reason we put 128 bits in there. :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 865 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20120126/c7f51393/attachment.bin>

References:
- using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?
  - From: streiner at cluebyfour.org (Justin M. Streiner)
- using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?
  - From: rps at maine.edu (Ray Soucy)
- using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?
  - From: streiner at cluebyfour.org (Justin M. Streiner)
- using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?
  - From: rps at maine.edu (Ray Soucy)
- using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?
  - From: tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk (Tim Chown)
- using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?
  - From: gbonser at seven.com (George Bonser)
- using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?
  - From: tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk (Tim Chown)
- using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?
  - From: rps at maine.edu (Ray Soucy)
- using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?
  - From: tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk (Tim Chown)
- using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?
  - From: tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk (Tim Chown)
- using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)

Prev by Date: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?
Next by Date: 10G switchrecommendaton
Previous by thread: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?
Next by thread: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread