[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?
- Subject: using ULA for 'hidden' v6 devices?
- From: streiner at cluebyfour.org (Justin M. Streiner)
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:51:46 -0500 (EST)
Is anyone using ULA (RFC 4193) address space for v6 infrastructure that
does not need to be exposed to the outside world? I understand the
concept of having fc00::/8 being doled out by the RIRs never went
anywhere, and using space out of fd00::/8 can be a bit of a crap-shoot
because of the likelihood of many organizations that do so not following
the algorithm for picking a /48 that is outlined in the RFC.
There would appear to be reasonable arguments for and against using ULA.
I'm just curious about what people are doing in practice.
jms