[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?

Subject: BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?
From: khelms at ispalliance.net (Scott Helms)
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 16:16:34 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CABL6YZSivZUP9Z-vARzBsNoRE1iw7naaxtMuCTv1O6a01EJNiQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAP-guGUCOrjDpF6DXvs_FAaXO4afsds=0OjPTLoEkdKVSAS5_A@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLaZhPFyXjVqQh-9zTRc6hzXdeymE_NTBzJ6j+LSTySFr1A@mail.gmail.com> <CAP-guGUM6eRbBzp8YmWTnTD2pf7EmEzr383D+6W6Co5gL=OeYw@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

Probability is much too strong IMO.  Most businesses don't even consider 
multi-homing and many that do use NAT devices with several connections 
rather than trying to run BGP.

#not associated nor do I recommend, just an example

http://www.fatpipeinc.com/warp/index.html


> This ignores the probability that cost effective BGP service availability would
> strongly drive demand for AS Numbers and adoption of the technology.
>
> Owen
>
>
>


-- 
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
--------------------------------
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
--------------------------------

Follow-Ups:
- BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)

References:
- BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?
  - From: j at arpa.com (jamie rishaw)
- BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?
  - From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)
- BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)

Prev by Date: BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?
Next by Date: BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?
Previous by thread: BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?
Next by thread: BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread