[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?

Subject: BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?
From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 10:08:45 -0400
In-reply-to: <CAP-guGUCOrjDpF6DXvs_FAaXO4afsds=0OjPTLoEkdKVSAS5_A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABL6YZSivZUP9Z-vARzBsNoRE1iw7naaxtMuCTv1O6a01EJNiQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAP-guGUCOrjDpF6DXvs_FAaXO4afsds=0OjPTLoEkdKVSAS5_A@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 9:07 AM, William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:
> As much as I'd love for
> Verizon to offer BGP directly over FIOS there are fewer than 40,000

I'm curious as to your number... where is that from?
Marhsall had noted a number of 'small businesses' in the US at ~1.4m
as of ~2006ish?

I'd think that there are many use-cases where BGP is useful for end
users of FIOS, turning out a 'business' class of service without BGP
seems like a less useful 'business' solution (especially where the sla
isn't really much better than the consumer solution).

-chris

Follow-Ups:
- BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?
  - From: mansaxel at besserwisser.org (Måns Nilsson)
- BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?
  - From: joelja at bogus.com (joel jaeggli)
- BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?
  - From: cboyd at gizmopartners.com (Chris Boyd)

References:
- BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?
  - From: j at arpa.com (jamie rishaw)
- BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?
  - From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)

Prev by Date: BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?
Next by Date: IETF contacts? - Fwd: Reference to historic or obsolated RFCs
Previous by thread: BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?
Next by thread: BGPttH. Neustar can do it, why can't we?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread