[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities
- Subject: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities
- From: keegan.holley at sungard.com (Keegan Holley)
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:19:38 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CAL9jLaa=NADOgo=s3vcz9EZn9D6+cHSKMOkVVOobCf4Uqneg4A@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CABO8Q6RNp-VFSu1S=Cd9ZwtCgM7-sh_W50OWA=Xtrx8wU_1DBA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLaa=NADOgo=s3vcz9EZn9D6+cHSKMOkVVOobCf4Uqneg4A@mail.gmail.com>
2011/10/11 Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists at gmail.com>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Keegan Holley
> <keegan.holley at sungard.com> wrote:
> > The definition of clean is also subjective. There are many who would run
> > the IGP only for loopbacks and /30's and force everything into BGP even
> at
> > small scale. BGP makes it easier to control the routing relationships
> > between companies and pretty much removes the need for redistribution.
> > There are trade-offs though, such as load-balancing.
>
> just loadbalance toward the next-hop, no?
>
It depends on the IGP, whether the paths have exactly the same metric and
whether or not you need to run MPLS.