[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities
- Subject: SP / Enterprise design (dis)similarities
- From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 01:17:00 -0400
- In-reply-to: <CABO8Q6RNp-VFSu1S=Cd9ZwtCgM7-sh_W50OWA=Xtrx8wU_1DBA@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[email protected]> <CABO8Q6RNp-VFSu1S=Cd9ZwtCgM7-sh_W50OWA=Xtrx8wU_1DBA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Keegan Holley
<keegan.holley at sungard.com> wrote:
> The definition of clean is also subjective. ?There are many who would run
> the IGP only for loopbacks and /30's and force everything into BGP even at
> small scale. ?BGP makes it easier to control the routing relationships
> between companies and pretty much removes the need for redistribution.
> There are trade-offs though, such as load-balancing.
just loadbalance toward the next-hop, no?