[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
On 21 Jun 2011, at 00:29, Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org> wrote:
>
> I will repeat my assertion. There is no such thing as glue records
> for the nameservers at the top of the zone within the zone itself
> be they in-baliwick or not. Glue records live in the parent zone
> and are there to avoid the catch 22 situation of needing the records
> to find the records.
I understand "in-bailiwick" to be a property of the name of a nameserver, independent of whether you are looking at the glue or authoritative NS RRs - it is not the same as "in-zone". In-bailiwick nameservers must have glue. But you said ''There is also no such thing as 'in-bailiwick glue for the TLD's DNS servers'.'' I think you are arguing about the meaning and location of glue, whereas I am arguing about the meaning of "in-bailiwick".
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <dot at dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
- References:
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: jra at baylink.com (Jay Ashworth)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: ikiris at gmail.com (Blake Dunlap)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: ghira at mistral.co.uk (Adam Atkinson)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: jbaino at gmail.com (Jeremy)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: mike at mtcc.com (Michael Thomas)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: dougb at dougbarton.us (Doug Barton)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: dot at dotat.at (Tony Finch)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)