[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
On 06/19/2011 07:08 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
>> From: David Conrad<drc at virtualized.org>
>> Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 16:04:09 -1000
>>
>> On Jun 19, 2011, at 3:24 PM, Paul Vixie wrote:
>>
>>
>>> i think we have to just discourage lookups of single-token names,
>>> universally.
>>>
>> How?
>>
> that's a good question. marka mentioned writing an RFC, but i expect
> that ICANN could also have an impact on this by having applicants sign
> something that says "i know that my single-label top level domain name
> will not be directly usable the way normal domain names are and i intend
> to use it only to register subdomain names which will work normally."
>
Isn't this problem self regulating? If sufficient things break
with a single label, people will stop making themselves
effectively unreachable, right?
Mike
- References:
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: jra at baylink.com (Jay Ashworth)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: ikiris at gmail.com (Blake Dunlap)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: ghira at mistral.co.uk (Adam Atkinson)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: jbaino at gmail.com (Jeremy)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)