[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
In message <83163718-FA5B-47BA-BA50-67701ABD5601 at virtualized.org>, David Conrad
writes:
> On Jun 19, 2011, at 6:39 PM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > I'm curious how anyone that has not signed a agreement with ICANN
> > can be bound to anything in any applicant guide book. =20
>
> In order to obtain a gTLD, you have to sign a contractual agreement with =
> ICANN.
David, you are missing the point. The TM holder doesn't want the
gtld, they just want to protect their trademark. The TM holder
doesn't have a contract with ICANN. They do however have a legitimate
right to the name and want to spend $0 keeping the name out of
anybodys hands but theirs. $187K is not longer a amount to be
sneezed at.
Mark
> > Also rfp-clean-30may11-en.pdf basically deals with <tm>.<gtld>.
>
> You might want to re-read pretty much any part of that document (e.g., =
> the title).
>
> Regards,
> -drc
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka at isc.org
- References:
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: jra at baylink.com (Jay Ashworth)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: ikiris at gmail.com (Blake Dunlap)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: ghira at mistral.co.uk (Adam Atkinson)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: jbaino at gmail.com (Jeremy)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: mike at mtcc.com (Michael Thomas)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: gbonser at seven.com (George Bonser)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: marka at isc.org (Mark Andrews)
- unqualified domains, was ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
- From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)