[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IP4 Space
On 23/03/2010, at 3:43 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> With the smaller routing table afforded by IPv6, this will be less expensive. As a result, I suspect there will be more IPv6 small multihomers.
> That's generally a good thing.
Puzzled: How does the IPv6 routing table get smaller?
There's currently social pressure against deaggregation, but given time
why do you think the same drivers that lead to v4 deaggregation won't also
lead to v6 deaggregation?
(small multihomers means more discontiguous blocks of PI space too, right?)
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: newton at internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: newton at atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
"Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton" Mobile: +61-416-202-223
- Follow-Ups:
- IP4 Space
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- IP4 Space
- From: isabeldias1 at yahoo.com (isabel dias)
- References:
- IP4 Space
- From: tmagill at providecommerce.com (Thomas Magill)
- IP4 Space
- From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- IP4 Space
- From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)
- IP4 Space
- From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- IP4 Space
- From: sob at academ.com (Stan Barber)
- IP4 Space
- From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- IP4 Space
- From: sob at academ.com (Stan Barber)
- IP4 Space
- From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)
- IP4 Space
- From: sob at academ.com (Stan Barber)
- IP4 Space
- From: dts at senie.com (Daniel Senie)
- IP4 Space
- From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)