[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IP4 Space
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:15 PM, David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org> wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2010, at 2:30 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>> Because we expect far fewer end users to multihome tomorrow than do today?
>
> We do?
>
> Why do we expect this?
David,
Well, I don't know that "we" do, but Joel made a remarkable assertion
that non-aggregable assignments to end users, the ones still needed
for multihoming, would go down under IPv6. I wondered about his
reasoning. Stan then offered the surprising clarification that a
reduction in the use of NAT would naturally result in a reduction of
multihoming.
Regards,
Bill
--
William D. Herrin ................ herrin at dirtside.com bill at herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
- Follow-Ups:
- IP4 Space
- From: joelja at bogus.com (Joel Jaeggli)
- IP4 Space
- From: sob at academ.com (Stan Barber)
- References:
- IP4 Space
- From: tmagill at providecommerce.com (Thomas Magill)
- IP4 Space
- From: bill at herrin.us (William Herrin)
- IP4 Space
- From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)