[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Open Security (was Re:[a string that stops delivery here])
- Subject: Open Security (was Re:[a string that stops delivery here])
- From: LarrySheldon at cox.net (Larry Sheldon)
- Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:09:46 -0500
- In-reply-to: <1269006269.1220.135.camel@petrie>
- References: <[email protected]> <20100319083143.553b0111@t61p> <1269006269.1220.135.camel@petrie>
On 3/19/2010 08:44, William Pitcock wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 08:31 -0500, John Kristoff wrote:
>> An ongoing area of work is to build better closed,
>> trusted communities without leaks.
>
> Have you ever considered that public transparency might not be a bad
> thing? This seems to be the plight of many security people, that they
> have to be 100% secretive in everything they do, which is total
> bullshit.
>
> Just saying.
It is clear that our security would be much improved if our politicians
had to operate out in the open.
--
Democracy: Three wolves and a sheep voting on the dinner menu.
Requiescas in pace o email
Ex turpi causa non oritur actio
Eppure si rinfresca
ICBM Targeting Information: http://tinyurl.com/4sqczs
http://tinyurl.com/7tp8ml
- References:
- NSP-SEC
- From: gfortaine at live.com (Guillaume FORTAINE)
- NSP-SEC
- From: jtk at cymru.com (John Kristoff)
- NSP-SEC
- From: nenolod at systeminplace.net (William Pitcock)