[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

NSP-SEC

Subject: NSP-SEC
From: nenolod at systeminplace.net (William Pitcock)
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 08:44:29 -0500
In-reply-to: <20100319083143.553b0111@t61p>
References: <[email protected]> <20100319083143.553b0111@t61p>

On Fri, 2010-03-19 at 08:31 -0500, John Kristoff wrote:
> An ongoing area of work is to build better closed,
> trusted communities without leaks. 

Have you ever considered that public transparency might not be a bad
thing?  This seems to be the plight of many security people, that they
have to be 100% secretive in everything they do, which is total
bullshit.

Just saying.

William

Follow-Ups:
- NSP-SEC - should read Integrity
  - From: bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com (bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com)
- Open Security (was Re:[a string that stops delivery here])
  - From: LarrySheldon at cox.net (Larry Sheldon)
- NSP-SEC
  - From: streiner at cluebyfour.org (Justin M. Streiner)
- NSP-SEC
  - From: hank at efes.iucc.ac.il (Hank Nussbacher)

References:
- NSP-SEC
  - From: gfortaine at live.com (Guillaume FORTAINE)
- NSP-SEC
  - From: jtk at cymru.com (John Kristoff)

Prev by Date: NSP-SEC
Next by Date: NSP-SEC
Previous by thread: NSP-SEC
Next by thread: NSP-SEC - should read Integrity
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread