Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course

[kauer at biplane.com.au (Karl Auer)]

On Sat, 2010-07-24 at 10:42 -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
> You do have to properly set up the rules for which addresses to use for what
> communication properly. It breaks less if you forego the ULA brokenness,
> but, some people insist for whatever reason.

What is "the ULA brokenness"?

Regards, K.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au)                   +61-2-64957160 (h)
http://www.biplane.com.au/~kauer/                  +61-428-957160 (mob)

GPG fingerprint: B386 7819 B227 2961 8301 C5A9 2EBC 754B CD97 0156
Old fingerprint: 07F3 1DF9 9D45 8BCD 7DD5 00CE 4A44 6A03 F43A 7DEF
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20100725/263d4de8/attachment.bin>