[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course
- Subject: Addressing plan exercise for our IPv6 course
- From: bora at pnl.gov (Akyol, Bora A)
- Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 19:53:48 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
As long as customers believe that having a NAT router/"firewall" in place is a security feature,
I don't think anyone is going to get rid of the NAT box.
In all reality, NAT boxes do work for 99% of customers out there.
Bora
On 7/22/10 7:34 PM, "Owen DeLong" <owen at delong.com> wrote:
Well, wouldn't it be better if the provider simply issued enough space to
make NAT66 unnecessary?
Owen