[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IPv6 BGP table size comparisons
- Subject: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons
- From: mksmith at adhost.com (Michael K. Smith - Adhost)
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 01:25:31 +0000
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAKTyXRN5/+lGvU59a+P7CFMBAN6gY+ZG84BMpVQcAbDh1IQAAAATbSgAABAAAACxBkw5QKESRLPlwbIdBE4HAQAAAAA=@iname.com> <[email protected]> <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAKTyXRN5/+lGvU59a+P7CFMBAN6gY+ZG84BMpVQcAbDh1IQAAAATbSgAABAAAAAEThYncSqKTaelGbK7oMrRAQAAAAA=@iname.com> <[email protected]>
On Dec 21, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 12/21/2010 14:18, Frank Bulk wrote:
>> There are 4,035 routes in the global IPv6 routing table. This is what one
>> provider passed on to me for routes (/48 or larger prefixes), extracted from
>> public route-view servers.
>> AT&T AS7018: 2,851 (70.7%)
>> Cogent AS174: 2,864 (71.0%)
>> GLBX AS3549: 3,706 (91.8%)
>> Hurricane Electric AS6939: 3,790 (93.9%)
>> Qwest AS209: 3,918 (97.1%)
>> TINET (formerly Tiscali) AS3257: 3,825 (94.8%)
>> Verizon AS701: 3,938 (97.6%)
>>
>
>
> Does this mean Verizon is carrying PI /48s now?
>
> ~Seth
>
Yes they are.
Mike