[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IPv6 BGP table size comparisons
- Subject: IPv6 BGP table size comparisons
- From: Bryan at bryanfields.net (Bryan Fields)
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:56:27 -0500
- In-reply-to: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAKTyXRN5/+lGvU59a+P7CFMBAN6gY+ZG84BMpVQcAbDh1IQAAAATbSgAABAAAACxBkw5QKESRLPlwbIdBE4HAQAAAAA=@iname.com>
- References: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAuAAAAAAAAAKTyXRN5/+lGvU59a+P7CFMBAN6gY+ZG84BMpVQcAbDh1IQAAAATbSgAABAAAACxBkw5QKESRLPlwbIdBE4HAQAAAAA=@iname.com>
On 12/21/2010 11:32, Frank Bulk wrote:
> A week or more ago someone posted in NANOG or elsewhere a site that had made
> a comparison of the IPv6 BGP table sizes of different operators (i.e. HE,
> Cogent, Sprint, etc), making the point that a full view might take multiple
> feeds. I think that website also had text files with the comparisons.
Whip yours out and lets have an on list comparison of table sizes
:-D
--
Bryan Fields
727-409-1194 - Voice
727-214-2508 - Fax
http://bryanfields.net