[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
PacketShader
- Subject: PacketShader
- From: nanog at 85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org (Mark Smith)
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 21:30:06 +0930
- In-reply-to: <104783.1282557583@localhost>
- References: <00BC692B904D4C4CB380A3074CB0E4EA@DELL16> <104783.1282557583@localhost>
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 05:59:43 -0400
Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Aug 2010 22:23:19 -1000, Michael Painter said:
> > Researchers in South Korea have built a networking router that transmits data
> > at record speeds from components found in most high-end desktop computers
> > http://www.technologyreview.com/communications/26096/?nlid=3423
>
> Two great quotes from the article:
>
> "That isn't fast enough to take advantage of the full speed of a typical
> network card, which operates at 10 gigabytes per second."
>
> Anybody got a network of PCs that have cards that run at 10GBytes/sec? ;)
>
I missed that, and that answers the "was it a GigaBytes verses Gigabits
error" question. Nothing new here by the looks of it - people in this
thread were getting those sorts of speeds a year ago out of PC hardware
under Linux -
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/15/234
"I have achieved a collective throughput of 66.25 Gbit/s."
"We've achieved 70 Gbps aggregate unidirectional TCP performance from
one P6T6 based system to another."
- References:
- PacketShader
- From: tvhawaii at shaka.com (Michael Painter)
- PacketShader
- From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)