[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
legacy /8
* Michael Dillon
> Do you have an actual example of a vendor, today, charging a higher
> license fee for IPv6 support?
Juniper. If you want to run OSPFv3 on their layer 3 switches, you need
a quite expensive "advanced" licence. OSPFv2, on the other hand, is
included in the base licence.
Our IPv6 topology is largely based on static routes because of this.
There's no customers that are willing to pay extra for IPv6 support at
the moment, hence we cannot justify the extra cost of the licences. It
sucks. I hope Juniper will come to their senses soon.
BR,
--
Tore Anderson
Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Tel: +47 21 54 41 27
- Follow-Ups:
- legacy /8
- From: sthaug at nethelp.no (sthaug at nethelp.no)
- legacy /8
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- References:
- legacy /8
- From: jeroen at mompl.net (Jeroen van Aart)
- legacy /8
- From: deleskie at gmail.com (jim deleskie)
- legacy /8
- From: nanog2 at adns.net (John Palmer (NANOG Acct))
- legacy /8
- From: gbonser at seven.com (George Bonser)
- legacy /8
- From: gbonser at seven.com (George Bonser)
- legacy /8
- From: wavetossed at googlemail.com (Michael Dillon)
- legacy /8
- From: LarrySheldon at cox.net (Larry Sheldon)
- legacy /8
- From: wavetossed at googlemail.com (Michael Dillon)
- legacy /8
- From: frnkblk at iname.com (Frank Bulk)
- legacy /8
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- legacy /8
- From: wavetossed at googlemail.com (Michael Dillon)