[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
legacy /8
> If "every significant router on the market" supported IPv6 five years ago,
and if cash fell from the sky ...
to folk actually running real networks, 'support' means *parity* with
ipv4, i.e. fast path at decent rates, management and monitoring, no
licensing extortion, ...
we don't have that today!
the *additional* cost and effort to the isp of fullly deploying
dual-stack is still non-trivial. this is mightily off-pissing.
randy
- Follow-Ups:
- legacy /8
- From: wavetossed at googlemail.com (Michael Dillon)
- References:
- legacy /8
- From: jeroen at mompl.net (Jeroen van Aart)
- legacy /8
- From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- legacy /8
- From: jimb at jsbc.cc (Jim Burwell)
- legacy /8
- From: gbonser at seven.com (George Bonser)
- legacy /8
- From: deleskie at gmail.com (jim deleskie)
- legacy /8
- From: nanog2 at adns.net (John Palmer (NANOG Acct))
- legacy /8
- From: gbonser at seven.com (George Bonser)
- legacy /8
- From: gbonser at seven.com (George Bonser)
- legacy /8
- From: wavetossed at googlemail.com (Michael Dillon)
- legacy /8
- From: LarrySheldon at cox.net (Larry Sheldon)
- legacy /8
- From: wavetossed at googlemail.com (Michael Dillon)
- legacy /8
- From: frnkblk at iname.com (Frank Bulk)