[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AH or ESP
On 27/05/2009, at 8:11 AM, Roland Dobbins wrote:
>
> On May 27, 2009, at 3:00 AM, Tony Hain wrote:
>
>> Just because you can't use it for IPv4 is no reason to avoid using
>> it for IPv6 now and let its momentum suppress the 66CGN walled
>> garden mindset.
>
> I concur quite strongly with your views on this particular topic,
> but the CGN boat appears to've sailed, AFAICT.
Note that Tony is talking about 6-to-6 NAT, not 6-to-4 NAT or vice
versa (not to be confused with 6to4 tunnelling).
I'm not sure that boat has sailed yet.
--
Nathan Ward
- References:
- AH or ESP
- From: kohn.jack at gmail.com (Jack Kohn)
- AH or ESP
- From: kaeo at merike.com (Merike Kaeo)
- AH or ESP
- From: kohn.jack at gmail.com (Jack Kohn)
- AH or ESP
- From: glen.kent at gmail.com (Glen Kent)
- AH or ESP
- From: kaeo at merike.com (Merike Kaeo)
- AH or ESP
- From: kohn.jack at gmail.com (Jack Kohn)
- AH or ESP
- From: kaeo at merike.com (Merike Kaeo)
- AH or ESP
- From: alh-ietf at tndh.net (Tony Hain)
- AH or ESP
- From: rdobbins at arbor.net (Roland Dobbins)