[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AH or ESP
On May 27, 2009, at 3:00 AM, Tony Hain wrote:
> Just because you can't use it for IPv4 is no reason to avoid using
> it for IPv6 now and let its momentum suppress the 66CGN walled
> garden mindset.
I concur quite strongly with your views on this particular topic, but
the CGN boat appears to've sailed, AFAICT.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins at arbor.net> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com>
Unfortunately, inefficiency scales really well.
-- Kevin Lawton
- Follow-Ups:
- AH or ESP
- From: nanog at daork.net (Nathan Ward)
- References:
- AH or ESP
- From: kohn.jack at gmail.com (Jack Kohn)
- AH or ESP
- From: kaeo at merike.com (Merike Kaeo)
- AH or ESP
- From: kohn.jack at gmail.com (Jack Kohn)
- AH or ESP
- From: glen.kent at gmail.com (Glen Kent)
- AH or ESP
- From: kaeo at merike.com (Merike Kaeo)
- AH or ESP
- From: kohn.jack at gmail.com (Jack Kohn)
- AH or ESP
- From: kaeo at merike.com (Merike Kaeo)
- AH or ESP
- From: alh-ietf at tndh.net (Tony Hain)