[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IPv6 Confusion

Subject: IPv6 Confusion
From: alh-ietf at tndh.net (Tony Hain)
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:20:59 -0800
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <6CDE22DE80A63A4DACF4FE2C916519A53F022F784D@BLV11EXVS01.corp.dm.local><[email protected]><6CDE22DE80A63A4DACF4FE2C916519A53F022F788E@BLV11EXVS01.corp.dm.local><050701c99135$df0f0ed0$9d2d2c70$@net> <m2hc2s1uip.wl%[email protected]> <C035DD0A88EFF241A24578B7B8D5B505014B90CB@intranet.mail.hostingshop.com.au> <[email protected]>

Justin Shore wrote:
> ...
> At this point I'm looking at doing 6to4 tunnels far into the future.

You can forget that, as CGN will break 6to4. Get used to teredo (miredo),
and if that is impeded don't be surprised when IPv6 over SOAP shows up. 

Tony

References:
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: Carl.Rosevear at demandmedia.com (Carl Rosevear)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: owen at delong.com (Owen DeLong)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: Carl.Rosevear at demandmedia.com (Carl Rosevear)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: alh-ietf at tndh.net (Tony Hain)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: randy at psg.com (Randy Bush)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: stevel at dedicatedservers.net.au (Steven Lisson)
- IPv6 Confusion
  - From: justin at justinshore.com (Justin Shore)

Prev by Date: IPv6 Confusion
Next by Date: IPv6 Confusion
Previous by thread: IPv6 Confusion
Next by thread: IPv6 Confusion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread