[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IPv6 Confusion
- Subject: IPv6 Confusion
- From: david.freedman at uk.clara.net (David Freedman)
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:05:19 +0000
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <6CDE22DE80A63A4DACF4FE2C916519A53F022F784D@BLV11EXVS01.corp.dm.local> <[email protected]>
>
> It's a 128 bit address. Routing is done on VLSM, but, generally for DNS
> purposes, these
> are expected to be at least on nibble boundaries.
>
> There is an intent to support what is known as EUI-64, which means every
> subnet should
> be a /64, however, there are people who number smaller subnets and that
> is supposed
> to work, but, it will break certain IPv6 things like stateless
> autoconfiguration (which is
> optional).
We are one of these people who opted to use smaller subnet sizes
for point-to-point networks (i.e router transfer nets),
If you are interested in what we did and want to see some examples of
what other people are doing check out a presentation that I gave some
time ago about our deployment
http://www.convergence.cx/ipv6clara.ppt
(apologies for the lack of PDF)
Slides 2-15
Dave.