[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space

Subject: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
From: david at davidcoulson.net (David Coulson)
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:58:21 -0500
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <002201c98550$c50a1520$4f1e3f60$@com> <[email protected]>

I'm curious - Any particular technical reason not to assign out of 
0.0.0.0/8? Can't say I've ever tried to use it, but I'd think it should 
work.

David Conrad wrote:
> Is this true?
>
> This will cause endless entertainment when IANA allocates 1.0.0.0/8 
> sometime within the next two or three years...
>

References:
- Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
  - From: trey at kingfisherops.com (Trey Darley)
- Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
  - From: imb at protected-networks.net (Michael Butler)
- Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
  - From: bruce at yoafrica.com (Bruce Grobler)
- Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
  - From: drc at virtualized.org (David Conrad)

Prev by Date: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
Next by Date: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
Previous by thread: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
Next by thread: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread