[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space

Subject: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
From: trey at kingfisherops.com (Trey Darley)
Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:48:29 +0100 (CET)

Hi, y'all -

Some colleagues and I are running into a bit of a problem. We've been
using RFC 1918 Class A space but due to the way subnets have been
allocated we are pondering the use of public IP space. As the network in
question is strictly closed I don't anticipate any problems with this as
the addresses would be unambiguous within our environment. I'm curious if
anyone else is doing this.

I'd be very interested in corresponding off-list with anyone who's in a
similar position.

Cheers,
--Trey
++----------------------------------------------------------------------------++
Kingfisher Operations
Trey Darley - Principal

Follow-Ups:
- Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
  - From: pstewart at nexicomgroup.net (Paul Stewart)
- Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
  - From: ops.lists at gmail.com (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
- Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
  - From: jeff at ocjtech.us (Jeffrey Ollie)
- Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
  - From: imb at protected-networks.net (Michael Butler)
- Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
  - From: streiner at cluebyfour.org (Justin M. Streiner)
- Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
  - From: jeroen at unfix.org (Jeroen Massar)
- Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
  - From: rays at maine.edu (Soucy, Ray)
- Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
  - From: stephen at sprunk.org (Stephen Sprunk)

Prev by Date: All Google Search Results: "This site may harm your computer."
Next by Date: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
Previous by thread: All Google Search Results: "This site may harm your computer."
Next by thread: Private use of non-RFC1918 IP space
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread