[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IXP
On 18.04.2009 00:04 Paul Vixie wrote
>>> the 300-peer IXP's i've been associated with weren't quite full
>>> mesh in terms of who actually wanted to peer with whom, so, no.
>>
>> Much depends on your definition of "quite". Would 30% qualify?
>
> 30% would be an over-the-top success. has anybody ever run out of 1Q
> tags in an IXP context?
Why? You only need 1 ;-)
Arnold
--
Arnold Nipper / nIPper consulting, Sandhausen, Germany
email: arnold at nipper.de phone: +49 6224 9259 299
mobile: +49 172 2650958 fax: +49 6224 9259 333
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20090418/c710aa58/attachment.bin>
- Follow-Ups:
- IXP
- From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)
- References:
- IXP
- From: me at sharloncarty.net (Sharlon R. Carty)
- IXP
- From: elmi at 4ever.de (Elmar K. Bins)
- IXP
- From: ip at ioshints.info (Ivan Pepelnjak)
- IXP
- From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)
- IXP
- From: arnold at nipper.de (Arnold Nipper)
- IXP
- From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)
- IXP
- From: arnold at nipper.de (Arnold Nipper)
- IXP
- From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)