[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IXP

Subject: IXP
From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:04:13 +0000
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:59:15 +0200." <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

> > the 300-peer IXP's i've been associated with weren't quite full mesh
> > in terms of who actually wanted to peer with whom, so, no.
> 
> Much depends on your definition of "quite". Would 30% qualify?

30% would be an over-the-top success.  has anybody ever run out of 1Q tags
in an IXP context?

Follow-Ups:
- IXP
  - From: arnold at nipper.de (Arnold Nipper)

References:
- IXP
  - From: me at sharloncarty.net (Sharlon R. Carty)
- IXP
  - From: elmi at 4ever.de (Elmar K. Bins)
- IXP
  - From: ip at ioshints.info (Ivan Pepelnjak)
- IXP
  - From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)
- IXP
  - From: arnold at nipper.de (Arnold Nipper)
- IXP
  - From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)
- IXP
  - From: arnold at nipper.de (Arnold Nipper)

Prev by Date: downloading speed
Next by Date: downloading speed
Previous by thread: IXP
Next by thread: IXP
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread