[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IXP - PNI
On Fri, 17 Apr 2009, bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
> the vlan tagging idea is a virtualization of the PNI construct.
> why use an IX when running 10's/100's/1000's of private network
> interconnects will do?
>
>
> granted, if out of the 120 ASN's at an IX, 100 are exchanging on
> average - 80KBs - then its likley safe to dump them all into a single
> physical port and vlan tag the heck out of it.
>
> its those other 20 that demand some special care.
The construct also doesn't scale well for multicast traffic exchange if
there's a significant number of multicast peers even though the traffic
might be low for individual source ASNs. On the other hand, if the IXP
doesn't use IGMP/MLD snooping capable switches, then I suppose it doesn't
matter.
Antonio Querubin
whois: AQ7-ARIN
- Follow-Ups:
- IXP - PNI
- From: jgreco at ns.sol.net (Joe Greco)
- IXP - PNI
- From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)
- References:
- IXP
- From: me at sharloncarty.net (Sharlon R. Carty)
- IXP
- From: elmi at 4ever.de (Elmar K. Bins)
- IXP
- From: ip at ioshints.info (Ivan Pepelnjak)
- IXP
- From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)
- IXP
- From: arnold at nipper.de (Arnold Nipper)
- IXP
- From: kris.foster at gmail.com (kris foster)
- IXP
- From: arnold at nipper.de (Arnold Nipper)
- IXP
- From: kris.foster at gmail.com (kris foster)
- IXP - PNI
- From: bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com (bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com)