[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IXP
On 17.04.2009 21:04 kris foster wrote
> On Apr 17, 2009, at 12:00 PM, Arnold Nipper wrote:
>
>> On 17.04.2009 20:52 Paul Vixie wrote
>>
>>> with the advent of vlan tags, the whole idea of CSMA for IXP
>>> networks is passe.
>>> just put each pair of peers into their own private tagged vlan and
>>> let one of
>>> them allocate a V4 /30 and a V6 /64 for it. as a bonus, this
>>> prevents third
>>> party BGP (which nobody really liked which sometimes got turned on
>>> by mistake)
>>> and prevents transit dumping and/or "pointing default at" someone.
>>> the IXP no
>>> longer needs any address space, they're just a VPN provider.
>>> shared-switch
>>> connections are just virtual crossconnects.
>>
>> Large IXP have >300 customers. You would need up to 45k vlan tags,
>> wouldn't you?
>
> QinQ could solve this
>
not really
--
Arnold Nipper / nIPper consulting, Sandhausen, Germany
email: arnold at nipper.de phone: +49 6224 9259 299
mobile: +49 172 2650958 fax: +49 6224 9259 333
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20090417/b908d875/attachment.bin>
- Follow-Ups:
- IXP
- From: kris.foster at gmail.com (kris foster)
- References:
- IXP
- From: me at sharloncarty.net (Sharlon R. Carty)
- IXP
- From: elmi at 4ever.de (Elmar K. Bins)
- IXP
- From: ip at ioshints.info (Ivan Pepelnjak)
- IXP
- From: vixie at isc.org (Paul Vixie)
- IXP
- From: arnold at nipper.de (Arnold Nipper)
- IXP
- From: kris.foster at gmail.com (kris foster)
- Prev by Date:
IXP
- Next by Date:
IXP
- Previous by thread:
IXP
- Next by thread:
IXP
- Index(es):