latest false flag attack?

[juan.g71 at gmail.com (juan)]

On Sat, 22 Sep 2018 03:02:49 +0100
Peter Fairbrother <peter at tsto.co.uk> wrote:

> On 21/09/18 20:00, juan wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 22:20:19 +0100
> > Peter Fairbrother <peter at tsto.co.uk> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>
> >> WTC was rated for 3 hours major fire resistance.
> >>
> >> Put that another way - *it was rated so that it _would_ collapse after 3
> >> (or so) hours of major conflagration*.
> >>
> >> It's in the design docs.
> > 
> > 
> > 	Where's your evidence for that claim Peter? WHERE are those 'design docs' ?
> 

> Can't be bothered to look up any original references, and they need a 
> lawyer to interpret anyway,


	OK - So you don't have any reference for the claim and you admit that even if there was, it can mean anything, according to 'lawyers' .

	Thank you.