latest false flag attack?

[juan.g71 at gmail.com (juan)]

On Mon, 17 Sep 2018 22:20:19 +0100
Peter Fairbrother <peter at tsto.co.uk> wrote:


> 
> WTC was rated for 3 hours major fire resistance.
> 
> Put that another way - *it was rated so that it _would_ collapse after 3 
> (or so) hours of major conflagration*.
> 
> It's in the design docs.


	Where's your evidence for that claim Peter? WHERE are those 'design docs' ? 

	Please QUOTE-LINK the pertinent section of the 'design docs' that say 'rated for 3 hours of fire"