Request to mailing list cryptography rejected

[zen at freedbms.net (Zenaan Harkness)]

On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 09:09:54PM -0300, Juan wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 19:57:40 -0400
> grarpamp <grarpamp at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > What are your suggestions as to recourse?
> 
> 	No point in talking to people who do not listen. LIKE YOU.
> 
> 	So when you let me know that you actually read and thought
> 	abpit what I wrote to you, I might continue. 

I think grarpamp reactively missed your apropos rhetoric "Your
recourse against scum like metzger or any other censor
is...what...use a FREE channel?" - perhaps since you emboldened the
word "FREE" and so he missed that you were NOT doing reverse
psychology and simply pointing out the obvious irony that now he's
using a free (uncensored) comms channel.

Which is in fact the solution, and yes, which grarpamp seems to be
missing - The Ministry's programming is so powerful, that even
"logical" thinkers like grarpamp miss the obvious (I'm guessing he
still wants censorship, does not want the responsibility of being a
censor himself, so wants someone else to do the censoring, but wants
them to censor in just the way he wants the censoring to be so
censored - namely, that he personally does not get censored).

Yes, it is hilarious.

Grarpamp could start a brissdowner fork, with his royal self the
censor to show how censorship should REALLY be done - He only needs a
great title to give authority to His Royal Self so the plebes bow
low, massa, very low!

How about

  Grarpamp, Royal Hilarion of Sublime Censorship