[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Request to mailing list cryptography rejected

Subject: Request to mailing list cryptography rejected
From: grarpamp at gmail.com (grarpamp)
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2018 18:58:52 -0400
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <CAD2Ti28Kk60vOa_jcdm66jcd+9xu_deksMXMDrQdBnqVDK2NOA@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAD2Ti2_JBLCSsrHBVYUT0mZQpCA9x1tdJOqyo--FF-9t8dHYfg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <CAD2Ti29xVRv4T2z1hK9xxod00XNvHeSH0Y=R1mP7Rd2itCWNsg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 6:44 PM, juan <juan.g71 at gmail.com> wrote:
> , as far as posting goes.

Adding qualifiers changes the question.

> recourse against scum like
> metzger or any other censor is...what...use a FREE channel?

What is your suggested recourse?
Murder? Love? Talk? Tort? Subterfuge?
Economic / other pressure? Protest? Suicide?

>         So you don't have any recourse against these people if you play
>         by their scum 'rules', go figure.

What is your suggested mode of play?

Follow-Ups:
- Request to mailing list cryptography rejected
  - From: juan.g71 at gmail.com (juan)

References:
- Request to mailing list cryptography rejected
  - From: grarpamp at gmail.com (grarpamp)
- Request to mailing list cryptography rejected
  - From: juan.g71 at gmail.com (juan)
- Request to mailing list cryptography rejected
  - From: grarpamp at gmail.com (grarpamp)
- Request to mailing list cryptography rejected
  - From: juan.g71 at gmail.com (juan)
- Request to mailing list cryptography rejected
  - From: grarpamp at gmail.com (grarpamp)
- Request to mailing list cryptography rejected
  - From: juan.g71 at gmail.com (juan)

Prev by Date: Request to mailing list cryptography rejected
Next by Date: Flaws in AMD CPUs.
Previous by thread: Request to mailing list cryptography rejected
Next by thread: Request to mailing list cryptography rejected
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread