[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Surveillance Law

To: [email protected]
Subject: Surveillance Law
From: [email protected] (Seth)
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 09:56:02 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <CAD2Ti2873fgvw4cK4g9c=zbPBSSo=ZCr9Oipu4=9KQVnivFKxA@mail.gmail.com> <CAHWD2rJ-sab-O1MJo3zw3Dftv=iwgvZvo9E=vGyk7y0qxXLFdQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

On Tue, 19 May 2015 00:20:42 -0700, Juan <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tue, 19 May 2015 14:03:22 +0900
> Lodewijk andrÃ© de la porte <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Is this the same federation that has some states legalize drugs in
>> violation of federal and international law? How does one put faith in
>> law, if there's open governmental violation of it?
>
>
> 	What are you talking about? "Law" means "we government scumbags
> 	do whatever we want".

I prefer Marc Steven's [1] succinct definition in layman's term

   Law: An opinion backed by a gun

[1] http://marcstevens.net/

References:
- Surveillance Law
  - From: [email protected] (grarpamp)
- Surveillance Law
  - From: [email protected] (Lodewijk andré de la porte)
- Surveillance Law
  - From: [email protected] (Juan)

Prev by Date: Surveillance Law
Next by Date: Nuclear security
Previous by thread: Surveillance Law
Next by thread: Surveillance Law
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread