[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Mu [was: How worse is the Shellshock bash bug than Heartbleed?]

To: coderman <[email protected]>
Subject: Mu [was: How worse is the Shellshock bash bug than Heartbleed?]
From: [email protected] (Georgi Guninski)
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 12:42:30 +0300
Cc: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <CAJVRA1S_rYWEC7ysO3k51J9Tm0pHAHxn6mnZpgzjK3XNa75uzA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJVRA1Q1CVpS-QoWvV7QtN7OqPBa_ZdeJ4yGC=RRHN3DyM4E-g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]$> <CAJVRA1S_rYWEC7ysO3k51J9Tm0pHAHxn6mnZpgzjK3XNa75uzA@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Oct 05, 2014 at 12:35:51AM -0700, coderman wrote:
> On 10/1/14, Georgi Guninski <[email protected]> wrote:
> > ...
> > Might be wrong, but continue to disagree :)
> 
> 
> i would note that by this time for heartbleed[0], Community Health
> Systems was already hacked a long week and a half. yet shellshock
> still shows muted impact.
> 
> best regards,
> 
> 
> 
> 0. CHS was hacked roughly a week after heartbleed disclosed, see
> official disclosure (to SEC) in august impacting 4,500,000 patients.

ok, i won't argue :)

-- 
"Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong." - Oscar
Wilde quote

References:
- Mu [was: How worse is the Shellshock bash bug than Heartbleed?]
  - From: [email protected] (Georgi Guninski)
- Mu [was: How worse is the Shellshock bash bug than Heartbleed?]
  - From: [email protected] (coderman)

Prev by Date: Radical-safest TLDs in 2014
Next by Date: Radical-safest TLDs in 2014
Previous by thread: Mu [was: How worse is the Shellshock bash bug than Heartbleed?]
Next by thread: How worse is the shellshock bash bug than Heartbleed?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread