[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Mu [was: How worse is the Shellshock bash bug than Heartbleed?]

To: Georgi Guninski <[email protected]>
Subject: Mu [was: How worse is the Shellshock bash bug than Heartbleed?]
From: [email protected] (coderman)
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2014 00:35:51 -0700
Cc: [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]$>
References: <CAJVRA1Q1CVpS-QoWvV7QtN7OqPBa_ZdeJ4yGC=RRHN3DyM4E-g@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]$>

On 10/1/14, Georgi Guninski <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...
> Might be wrong, but continue to disagree :)

i would note that by this time for heartbleed[0], Community Health
Systems was already hacked a long week and a half. yet shellshock
still shows muted impact.

best regards,

0. CHS was hacked roughly a week after heartbleed disclosed, see
official disclosure (to SEC) in august impacting 4,500,000 patients.

Follow-Ups:
- Mu [was: How worse is the Shellshock bash bug than Heartbleed?]
  - From: [email protected] (Georgi Guninski)

References:
- Mu [was: How worse is the Shellshock bash bug than Heartbleed?]
  - From: [email protected] (Georgi Guninski)

Prev by Date: properly timing FOIPA for best results [was: 1977 Justice Dept. Report on CIA (was: Rockefeller Commission Report)]
Next by Date: Radical-safest TLDs in 2014
Previous by thread: Mu [was: How worse is the Shellshock bash bug than Heartbleed?]
Next by thread: Mu [was: How worse is the Shellshock bash bug than Heartbleed?]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread